Monday, March 27, 2023

Conflict Management - 1Corinthians 12:1-14:40 (Part 1)

 

Lesson 11: The Church’s Questions—Gifts

 

 The church, like society, is given to trends. Some issue will hold the attention of large numbers of Christians for a while. They will write books about it, hold seminars on it, split congregations over it. Then the issue will fade into the background, and another will come to the fore and replace it. In the late 60s and early to mid 70s, spiritual gifts were in vogue, and the charismatic movement took off, penetrating even mainline denominations. It was a frenzy at times as people tried either to discover their gift or to obtain a particular one. As with most fads, though, people got tired of it after a while. They had read enough, heard enough, agonized enough over the issue and wanted something else to occupy their attention. So, in the late 70s, discipleship because the new fad, with more books, more seminars, and so on until just about everybody, it seemed, was either discipling someone or being discipled by someone. All this to say that it seems the church has beaten to death the topic of spiritual gifts, to the point where we could almost skip it and move on to chapter 15, where Paul addresses next subject (resurrection).

           Apart from the fact that some in the congregation may not have been exposed to the issue, why is skipping it not a good idea?

         First, we need to review.

         We do not even remember some of what we studied last year let alone ten (or twenty) years ago.

         Second, we need to revise.

         A lot has happened to us in the interim. Our study and our experiences since then have filled in and broadened our view of God and the world, and it is important to adjust our understanding of “old” issues in the light of new information.

So we had better not jump ahead to chapter 15 just yet.

 Paul begins chapter 12 with a discussion of the Holy Spirit—his message, ministry, and manifestations.

 

              E. Gifts     12:1-14:40

 

1 Cor 12:1 Now about spiritual gifts, brothers, I do not want you to be ignorant. 2 You know that when you were pagans, somehow or other you were influenced and led astray to mute idols. 3 Therefore I tell you that no one who is speaking by the Spirit of God says, "Jesus be cursed," and no one can say, "Jesus is Lord," except by the Holy Spirit.  4 There are different kinds of gifts, but the same Spirit. 5 There are different kinds of service, but the same Lord. 6 There are different kinds of working, but the same God works all of them in all men.

 7 Now to each one the manifestation of the Spirit is given for the common good. 8 To one there is given through the Spirit the message of wisdom, to another the message of knowledge by means of the same Spirit, 9 to another faith by the same Spirit, to another gifts of healing by that one Spirit, 10 to another miraculous powers, to another prophecy, to another distinguishing between spirits, to another speaking in different kinds of tongues, [a] and to still another the interpretation of tongues. 11 All these are the work of one and the same Spirit, and he gives them to each one, just as he determines.

 

                   1.    There is one Spirit (12:1-11).

a.     His message promotes the messiah.148

b.    His ministry dispenses the gifts.149

c.     His method advances the common good.

 

Comment: About “…led astray to mute idols” (12:2)

 In v. 2, Paul reminds gentiles in the congregation about their past involvement with idolatry.

1 Cor 12:2 You know that when you were pagans, somehow or other you were influenced and led astray to mute idols.

In some cults, the idols, though dumb, were thought to speak through certain worshippers by using an inspired and unintelligible speech. (Remember, idols are not gods, but they still may represent supernatural powers.150) In other words, speaking in tongues—which seems to be the specific problem in these chapters— was not limited to the Christian community. By reviewing their pagan past, Paul wants them to realize that people cannot appeal to such utterances as evidence of their spirituality. Being able to speak in tongues is not proof that a person possesses the Holy Spirit; it may indicate that a demon possesses him. Tongues that are the product of the Holy Spirit have specific content (Fee 1987:578).151

 

Query: How is a spiritual gift different from a natural talent or a practiced skill?152

         When does a believer acquire a gift? (Presumably upon conversion)

         Can a believer have more than one gift?153

         How long does a person retain a gift…for life?

         Does this suggest another answer to when a believer may acquire a gift?

         Should we be trying to identify our (current) spiritual gift(s)?

 

Query: Does a medical doctor have the gift of healing? …Probably not, because his success depends on natural means (e.g., drugs, surgery) rather than supernatural means.

 

           

 In some cases, spiritual gifts, such as (the working of) miracles, are easily distinguishable as such, because there is no natural cause or counterpart. In other cases, such as teaching, what distinguishes a spiritual gift may not be its designation but its implementation—its being enhanced by the Holy Spirit. This is the difference between a secular teacher and a sacred teacher. It is not his title or his technique but his augmented ability to comprehend and communicate spiritual information.

 While a spiritual gift may be an acquired skill, it is not necessarily fully developed when the believer receives it. He is responsible to develop whatever gift(s) the Holy Spirit has given him.154 It is also important for others to recognize, acknowledge, and encourage the spiritual gifts within the congregation.

 

Summary: Paul contrasts the former circumstances of the Corinthians who were once pagan with their present circumstances. There were many idols, and these idols represented different and often competing spirits and their interests. The situation with God is not the same.

         The Holy Spirit is God’s only representative, and his primary interest is to promote Jesus. Consequently, the Spirit will not send mixed signals, one time saying “Jesus is cursed” and another time saying “Jesus is Lord.”

         The Holy Spirit has a specific function within the Godhead. (Did you notice an allusion to the trinity in vv. 4-6?) The Spirit gives gifts. No other member of the Godhead has that assignment, nor is the distribution of gifts delegated to other (lesser) spirits (e.g., angels). It is the responsibility of the “same Spirit” whose interest is to promote Jesus (which should give us a clue as to the ultimate purpose of spiritual gifts).

         The Holy Spirit fulfills his assignment by giving to each believer a gift that contributes to the common good. It is at the Spirit’s discretion which gift(s) a believer receives.155 One person’s gift will probably be different from another’s, but the reason the gift is given is the same in all circumstances:

for the benefit of others.

 

 From the Spirit, Paul turns to the church, describing it by analogy with the physical body.

 

1 Cor 12:12 The body is a unit, though it is made up of many parts; and though all its parts are many, they form one body. So it is with Christ. 13 For we were all baptized by one Spirit into one body—whether Jews or Greeks, slave or free—and we were all given the one Spirit to drink.

             

 14 Now the body is not made up of one part but of many. 15 If the foot should say, "Because I am not a hand, I do not belong to the body," it would not for that reason cease to be part of the body. 16 And if the ear should say, "Because I am not an eye, I do not belong to the body," it would not for that reason cease to be part of the body. 17 If the whole body were an eye, where would the sense of hearing be? If the whole body were an ear, where would the sense of smell be? 18 But in fact God has arranged the parts in the body, every one of them, just as he wanted them to be. 19 If they were all one part, where would the body be? 20 As it is, there are many parts, but one body.

 21 The eye cannot say to the hand, "I don't need you!" And the head cannot say to the feet, "I don't need you!" 22 On the contrary, those parts of the body that seem to be weaker are indispensable, 23 and the parts that we think are less honorable we treat with special honor. And the parts that are unpresentable are treated with special modesty, 24 while our presentable parts need no special treatment. But God has combined the members of the body and has given greater honor to the parts that lacked it, 25 so that there should be no division in the body, but that its parts should have equal concern for each other. 26 If one part suffers, every part suffers with it; if one part is honored, every part rejoices with it.

 27 Now you are the body of Christ, and each one of you is a part of it. 28 And in the church God has appointed first of all apostles, second prophets, third teachers, then workers of miracles, also those having gifts of healing, those able to help others, those with gifts of administration, and those speaking in different kinds of tongues. 29 Are all apostles? Are all prophets? Are all teachers? Do all work miracles? 30 Do all have gifts of healing? Do all speak in tongues? Do all interpret? 31 But eagerly desire the greater gifts.

             And now I will show you the most excellent way.

 

                   2.    There is one body (12:12-31).156

a.     It is self-sufficient, because all parts are different.

b.    It is interdependent, because all parts are necessary.

 

Query:

         How is the list in vv. 8-10 different from the list in vv. 28-30? (Random vs. priority order)

         Are the lists complete? (No, cf. singleness in 7:7; exhorting, giving, and mercy in Rom 12:3-8; evangelism and pastoring in Eph 4:11)

         Is it necessary for a congregation to have all the gifts?

         How do we know what we have? (Observation, experience, confirmation)

         Are we missing any spiritual gifts in our church that we should have? In some cases, spiritual gifts (e.g., miracles) are easily distinguishable, because there is no natural counterpart as such. In other cases (e.g., teaching, what distinguishes a spiritual gift may not be its designation but its implementation— enhanced by the Holy Spirit.

 

Query: Does a medical doctor have the gift of healing?

 In most cases, no, because his success depends on natural means (e.g., drugs, surgery) not supernatural means.

 

Summary: Paul makes an analogy with the physical body to illustrate the composition of the spiritual body, the church.

         The physical body is a self-sufficient conglomerate of different organs, each of which makes its own contribution. If all were the same, you would have a specialized donor bank but no body, because the collection would not be diverse enough to be self-sufficient.

         The physical body is also an interdependent conglomerate of different organs, because the contribution of each is necessary to the viability of the whole. If a certain organ, no matter how minor its contribution, stops functioning, the loss in that area will eventually affect other areas. Likewise, when a certain organ performs its function well, it can relieve the strain on other organs.

So it is with the spiritual body. Each member has a different but necessary role to play in order for the church to function well. The church does not exist so that everyone can exercise the same gift but different gifts. Paul is arguing for diversity, not uniformity…and uniformity is not the same as unity. In fact, in the church “there is no such thing as true unity without diversity” (Fee 1987:602). Furthermore, diversity makes the church an extension of its Lord, for as Paul noted in that allusion to the trinity (vv. 4-6), “diversity within unity belongs to the character of God himself” (Fee 1987:583), because each member of the Godhead has a different role.

 

 In chapter 12, Paul sets up a direct link for the distribution of gifts between one giver (Spirit) and one recipient (body). Yet the exercise of gifts is in the believers’ relations with others. In chapter 13, Paul continues the oneness theme (one Spirit, one body) by saying that there is one way to control the exercise of gifts in a proper fashion (love).

 This is a familiar section, almost too familiar. For many Christians it has become an abstraction, a beautiful sentiment suitable for weddings and other occasions equally unrelated to its place in 1 Cor. Yes, everything Paul says here about love is true, but he did not write it for a wedding. We must bear in mind that the catalyst for this composition is negative not positive, the absence of love in the Corinthians’ exercise of gifts.

 

             

1 Cor 13:1 If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal. 2 If I have the gift of prophecy and can fathom all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have a faith that can move mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. 3 If I give all I possess to the poor and surrender my body to the flames, but have not love, I gain nothing.

 4 Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. 5 It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. 6 Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. 7 It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.

 8 Love never fails. But where there are prophecies, they will cease; where there are tongues, they will be stilled; where there is knowledge, it will pass away. 9 For we know in part and we prophesy in part, 10 but when perfection comes, the imperfect disappears. 11 When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put childish ways behind me. 12 Now we see but a poor reflection as in a mirror; then we shall see face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I am fully known.

                13 And now these three remain: faith, hope and love. But the greatest of these is love.

 

                   3.    There is one way (13:1-13).

a.     Love is more desirable than any gift (greater priority).157

b.    Love is more durable than any gift (greater permanence).

 

Comment: About “…the tongues…of angels” (13:1)

 Some in the Charismatic movement think the gift of tongues is a celestial dialect angels speak, but that view does not do justice to the context.158

Paul was making a hypothetical case, just as in the subsequent verse, where he speaks about knowing all mysteries and knowledge…giving all his possessions to the poor, and giving his body to be burned. Paul was speaking theoretically, suggesting that even if those things were true, without love they would be meaningless…. Besides, there is no evidence in Scripture that angels use a heavenly language. Whenever angels appear in Scripture, they communicate in normal human language…. (MacArthur 1992:226)

 

Comment: About “…when perfection comes” (13:10)

 Paul makes a cryptic statement in v. 10, referring to a time when perfection will replace imperfection.

NIV: …when perfection comes, the imperfect disappears.

NAS: …when the perfect comes, the partial will be done away.

KJV: …when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away. Commentators interpret this verse in two basic ways, depending on whether or not they think the Spirit still gives sign gifts (e.g., tongues, prophecy).159

         Those who believe sign gifts were temporary phenomena to help the Church get started, say that was the “imperfect” situation Paul had in mind. By the end of the Apostolic Age, the Church was well-established (i.e., the “perfect” had come) and no longer needed sign gifts. In other words, we are in that perfect era and only need non-sign gifts.160

         Those who believe sign gifts are inseparable from other gifts the Spirit gives to the Church say that the “imperfect” situation Paul has in mind is what will prevail until the Messianic Age (the “perfect”), when Jesus returns or, more likely, until the New Heaven and New Earth. In other words, we are still in that imperfect era and need all the gifts.161

The issue for the church today is that either all gifts are available now or only nonsign gifts are available now. What do you think?

 

Query: Is love a spiritual gift?162 What is the difference between gifts and fruit?

         They differ in their design.

         Fruit are primarily for our own good, for development of godly character.

         Gifts are primarily for another’s good, for service in the body of believers.

         They differ in their distribution.

         Fruit are standard equipment; every believer is to produce every fruit.

         Gifts are specialized equipment; every believer has (at least) one (but not every) gift.

         They differ in their duration.

         Fruit are permanent (forever).

         Gifts are temporary (for now).

 

Summary: As some physical organs are more prominent than others in the body, so some spiritual gifts are more prominent than others in the church. For those in positions of prominence, there is the danger of pride, of thinking or assuming that what you do is more important than what someone else does, more important than his or her gift. Speaking to those in Corinth who hold such an opinion, Paul informs them that love exceeds all spiritual gifts, both qualitatively and quantitatively.

 The most prominent gifts (see list in 12:28) are useless if love does not accompany them. Love is more valuable than any spiritual gift. Furthermore, all gifts, even the most prominent ones, will eventually because obsolete. Their usefulness is for a limited time only. Love, on the other hand, will never become obsolete. Love will be around longer than any spiritual gift.

 Notice also that love is the great equalizer among believers. It evens things out now, because the Holy Spirit produces fruit in all believers, so every believer has the same potential to excel in love. It will also even things out later, because the gifts of all believers will one day expire. In other words, in the end, every believer will end up with the same basket of fruit.

 

 Corinth is a gifted church. In fact, Paul states at the beginning of this letter that they “do not lack any spiritual gift” (1:7), but they are not using their gifts properly. They are forgetting:

         That there is one Holy Spirit at work, promoting Jesus by dispensing gifts to advance the common good;

         That the church is like one body, which is self-sufficient because it has different parts yet interdependent because all its parts are necessary to the proper working of the whole;

         That there is one way to govern the exercise of spiritual gifts, a way more desirable and more durable than any gift—love.

The Corinthians were viewing the gifts in isolation, as distinct and unrelated spiritual manifestations. Paul argues not only that gifts are related to each other but that they form part of a larger picture. With this corrective in place, Paul proceeds to a more specific treatment of certain gifts, prophecy and tongues, and to the way these gifts are affecting the most important church function: worship.

 

Monday, March 20, 2023

Conflict Management - 1 Corinthians 11:17-34

 

Lesson 10: The Church’s Questions—Communion

 

 The next topic Paul addresses is a familiar one to most Christians because they observe it with some regularity (annually, quarterly, monthly, weekly): communion. As we read the passage, though, it becomes immediately apparent that the circumstances for the Corinthians are not quite the same as our own. The context suggests considerably more than a thimble of juice and a crumb of bread. This discrepancy has caused many commentators not a little distress, and in their effort at keeping the church separate from the synagogue, they have rejected the obvious setting and concocted their own (Fee 1987:532). I mention it only because in the course of your spiritual pilgrimage, either you already have or you may encounter someone who holds this position. Most people, however, are simply not aware of the alternative.

 The setting that is often conjectured is a so-called “Love Feast,” a curious phrase imported from Jude, which appears nowhere else in scripture.119 It was probably a communal meal similar to those held in pagan temples (as evinced by the frequent need to distinguish them) but sanitized for use in the church.120 We know nothing about the setting of the Love Feast, but we do know the setting of the Last Supper, which the synoptic gospels identify as the Passover.121

 We saw in chapter 5 that Paul anticipates the Corinthians will be celebrating Passover and has already given them certain instructions about it (v. 8). When he returns to the topic here, he identifies certain difficulties, gives Passover as the historical context for the Last Supper, makes specific reference to elements of the seder (“service”), and gives more instructions. If you have attended a Passover meal, you will be able to see why the problems Paul mentions may have arisen, and you should also be able to understand better the reason for Paul’s counsel. He calls them to task on at least four counts of improper behavior, each of which runs counter to the purpose or procedure of the Passover seder.

 

              D. Communion 11:17-34

 

1 Cor 11:17 In the following directives I have no praise for you, for your meetings do more harm than good. 18 In the first place, I hear that when you come together as a church, there are divisions among you, and to some extent I believe it. 19 No doubt there have to be differences among you to show which of you have God's approval. 20 When you come together, it is not the Lord's Supper you eat, 21 for as you eat, each of you goes ahead without waiting for anybody else. One remains hungry, another gets drunk. 22 Don't you have homes to eat and drink in? Or do you despise the church of God and humiliate those who have nothing? What shall I say to you? Shall I praise you for this? Certainly not!

 

                   1.   There are several problems with their current observance (vv. 17-

22).

a.     They exhibit division.122

       The seder commemorates corporate redemption, but they

miss what should unite them.123

b.    They exhibit disorder.

       The seder has a formal liturgy, but they follow no particular

order.124

c.     They exhibit drunkenness.

       The seder has four cups of wine, but they indulge in

excess.125

d.    They exhibit disregard.

       The seder is to include the needy, but they care only for

themselves.126

 

 Celebrating the Passover requires some discipline. There is quite a bit of liturgy before the meal, so when it is finally time to eat, people are pretty hungry. Paul’s suggestion in vv. 21-22a (and his instruction in v. 34), that they should eat before they come, he directs at those who cannot control their appetites.127 After condemning their impropriety, Paul turns to that aspect of the seder to which Jesus gave added significance and which they are apparently not keeping.128

 

1 Cor 11:23 For I received from the Lord what I also passed on to you: The Lord Jesus, on the night he was betrayed, took bread, 24 and when he had given thanks, he broke it and said, "This is my body, which is for you; do this in remembrance of me." 25 In the same way, after supper he took the cup, saying, "This cup is the new covenant in my blood; do this, whenever you drink it, in remembrance of me." 26 For whenever you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord's death until he comes.

 

                   2.       There are special practices for their correct observance (vv. 23-

26).129

a.     They recognize a specific piece of matzah.

       The afikomen (later) represents the paschal lamb.

b.    They recognize a specific pouring of wine.

       The “cup of redemption” represents deliverance from

bondage.

 

           


Comment: About “…this is my body” (v. 24)

 When Jesus connected bread and wine with his body and blood he was not implying that a physical or even a mystical change had taken place. The very thought would be repugnant to the disciples and would violate Torah. God clearly forbids the consumption of blood.130

Lev 3:17 This is a lasting ordinance for the generations to come, wherever you live: You must not eat…any blood.

The apostles, including Paul, placed this commandment in the first instructions for gentile converts.131

Acts 15:19 …for the Gentiles who are turning to God. 20 …we should write to them, telling them to abstain from food polluted by idols, from sexual immorality, from the meat of strangled animals and from blood. 21 For Moses has been preached in every city from the earliest times and is read in the synagogues on every Sabbath

The disciples would have considered both puzzling and pagan the interpretive fantasies that have exercised the church for so many years (e.g., transubstantiation and consubstantiation).132

The identification of the bread with the body is semitic imagery in its heightened form [cf. 1 Cor 10:4 “the rock was Christ”]. As in all such identifications, he means “this signifies/represents my body.” The presence of Jesus with them as he spoke these words would have made any other meaning impossible. It lies quite beyond Jesus’ intent and the framework within which he and his disciples lived to imagine that some actual change took place, or was intended to take place, in the bread itself. Such a view could only have arisen in the church at a much later stage when Greek modes of thinking had rather thoroughly replaced semitic ones. (Fee 1987:550)

 

Illustration: Consider how bizarre a typical communion scenario appears to a Jew, if it is taken literally (Rosen 1974:27-30).

 We went to church the next morning—it was Pentecost Sunday of 1953—and I went forward and professed my faith publicly, as Ceil had done on Easter Sunday. My whole outlook on life changed drastically after that. If Jesus was really the Promised One, the Messiah—and I believed deeply now that He was—then it seemed important for me to learn all about Him as quickly as possible and model my life after His.

 The only spiritual authority I knew, outside of the Bible, was the church, so I took everything my new minister said very seriously. All he had to do was to drop a hint that the members of the congregation should do this or that, and I’d try. We went to Sunday school, church, the Baptist Training Union on Sunday afternoons, and the evening service. The pastor suggested that more people should be attending the Wednesday night prayer meetings, and I arranged my hours at the sporting-goods store so that I could comply. When they had a deacons’ meeting, he would announce that other members of the church were also welcome, and I would take him at his word and show up for that. It took me a while to find that other Christians didn’t take all these admonitions and suggestions so seriously.

           

 My first few church services revealed an entirely new world. The music, for example, was radically different from chanting in the synagogue. All the hymns had a lilt to them, and I wasn’t accustomed to Christian symbolism. They sang, “There is a fountain filled with blood drawn from Immanuel’s veins; And sinners, plunged beneath that flood, lose all their guilty stains.” The cheerful lilting melody seemed so unsuited to the graphically violent lyrics. And I didn’t know who Immanuel was, but the poor guy seemed to be making a big contribution to the blood bank. I was as accepting as I could be, but it wasn’t easy. Then I noticed there was an item in the church bulletin: NEXT SUNDAY:

COMMUNION.

 An usher in the last row had told us when we arrived the first morning that if we needed any help, we should feel free to call on him. I think he was just being polite because, as I learned later, church services involve very little conversation among the listeners. The synagogue is much noisier. Even gossip during prayers is sanctified according to the Talmud. I also had to learn not to get up and walk around because Jewish tradition permits the congregation to enter and leave at will during the three-hour synagogue services.

 So, not knowing any better, I said, “Psst!” in a rather loud tone and motioned the usher over. “What does it mean, ‘Communion’?” I asked.

          “You’re Jewish, right?” he answered. “It’s a little like a Passover feast.”

 My eyes must have lit up at that. The Passover Seder usually involved a rather painless religious observance and then a huge repast. In my grandfather’s house we traditionally started with chopped liver (and onions), hard-boiled eggs (and onions), pickled herring (and onions), and matzo-ball soup. Those were just appetizers. Next came the roast meats—poultry, kid, and lamb. And finally we had several kinds of dessert, including honey cake, sponge cake, and macaroons. Communion sounded terrific to me.

             “How much does it cost?” I asked.

 “It doesn’t cost you anything,” he replied. “You just contribute anything you want to in the church collection plate.”

 That was a great improvement over the synagogue, where we had to buy tickets for most of the big events, including the major holiday services, and also were assessed a regular yearly membership fee. The bulletin said, “Prepare your hearts for Communion next Sunday,” and so I asked, “Should I do anything to help out, maybe bring something?  “No, it’s all provided,” he said.

             “Where will it be held?”

             “Right here in the sanctuary.”

 I looked around at the old oak pews but didn’t see much space for tables. TV trays had just come into vogue, and I thought maybe they’d fix the place up with a few of those. Ceil and I ate a very small breakfast the next Sunday because of the huge meal we expected at the service. I sought out the usher during Sunday school and double-checked with him about the time and place, because I didn’t want to miss anything. I suspected that, being Gentiles, they would serve bacon and ham and shrimp and other things that weren’t kosher, but it still seemed like a nice idea, a real treat.

 

           

 Ceil and I got seated in the sanctuary, and we began to sing songs about the blood again:

Oh! Precious is the flow

That makes me white as snow; No other fount I know,

Nothing but the blood of Jesus.

ROBERT LOWRY

 That wasn’t too appetizing, especially since I didn’t understand the real import of the words. But to top it all off, when I looked up at the front of the church, I saw on a table what looked like white shrouds, with a lump where the feet would be and another lump for the head. I thought, “Gee, they’re having a funeral today, too.” It made perfect sense to me that they’d be having a funeral that morning because their customs were so different from what I had known. But up to that point I hadn’t seen a dead body, and I had the usual terror of such things. And what did the pastor preach on? The body and blood of Christ: eating and drinking it.

 I hate to tell you the thoughts that were going through my mind. I knew they couldn’t have Christ up there under that shroud. And I knew deep down that these goyim weren’t cannibals. I decided the body was probably just being kept there, and they would have the funeral later that afternoon.

         “Psst!” I said and motioned my friend, the usher, over. “When are we going to have

Communion? I’m losing my appetite a little bit.”

             Straining to be patient, he said, “It’ll be in just a minute.”

 At the end of the service eight men dressed in dark suits went forward toward the shrouds. I didn’t know the difference between deacons and other church officials at that point, and so I decided they were the pallbearers. They gathered around what I assumed to be the funeral bier, and I expected they would carry the body out before we ate. But two of them moved to each end of the covered object and I could see they were waiting for a signal to lift the shroud. Oh, no, I thought. Suddenly the cover fell away, and there was nothing underneath except some little pots and pans.

             “Psst! What’s that?”

             “Communion.”

 Communion! I looked around and saw there were about three hundred people to feed. I was totally dumbfounded. After certain prayers were said, each person was given a crumb of matzo. Then there were some more prayers, and a blessing was offered over the wine. Finally, the deacons passed around little glass thimbles filled with what looked like wine But when I drank it, yech, it was grape juice! I couldn’t understand why they called it wine, and by now I was getting impatient.

      “Psst!” I said to my usher. “When are we going to have Communion?”          “You’ve had it,” he replied.

 I thought, boy, these goyim, they give you a crumb of matzo and a thimbleful of grape juice, and they have the nerve to call it a Passover feast. Then they criticize us Jews for being stingy!

 

           

In the Last Seder, when Jesus spoke about the bread and wine being his body and blood, he was simply using a metaphor, making a comparison between two things, as he did on many occasions.133

Matt 5:13 You are the salt of the earth.

Matt 5:14 You are the light of the world.

Matt 6:22 The eye is the lamp of the body.

Matt 23:33 [b ≈ 12:34a] You snakes! You brood of vipers!

Matt 26:26 This is my body.

Matt 26:28 This is my blood.

The point of this analogy may not always be clear,134 but that these are figures should be obvious.135 Our task is to determine the point of comparison. How is Jesus’ body like the matzah and his blood like the wine? Here are some options:

         There is a comparison with death in the acts of breaking and pouring.

         The breaking of bread is like the breaking of bones (so 1 Cor 11:24 in some ancient mss).

         The pouring of wine is like the shedding of blood, although the figure is

actually of a libation poured out (spent) at the altar (probably an allusion to Isa 53:12 “…he poured out his life unto death”).136

         There is a comparison with life in the elements of bread and wine.

         Bread, being a staple, has a strong associations with life.137

         Wine is associated with the joy and prosperity of God’s blessing.138              There is a comparison with deliverance in the elements of bread and wine.

         During the seder, the participants eat matzah at three different times, with each piece marking a certain part of the celebration.139

         The piece after the meal, called the afikomen, is the very last thing participants eat (Glatzer 1969:57),140 although there would still be two more cups of wine to drink. Oddly enough, and unlike other elements of the meal, Jewish tradition attaches no special symbolism to the afikomen until after the destruction of the temple, when it becomes a reminder of the paschal lamb, the means of their deliverance from death. It is probably the afikomen about which Jesus said: “This is my body” (Matt 26:26).141

         During the seder, the participants drink wine at four different times, with each cup marking a certain part of the celebration (Exod 6:6-7).142

         The cup just after the meal is called the cup of redemption (or “blessing,” as in 10:16, because redemption = blessing; Glatzer 1969:59), perhaps because Elijah’s cup is also filled at this time (= messianic expectation?).143 This follows the afikomen and is probably the one about which Jesus said: “This is my blood” (Matt 26:27-28; 1 Cor 11:25).

Whether Jesus chooses these elements because they already possessed some useful associations is uncertain. In any case, he takes two elements of a festival that commemorates physical deliverance from slavery and invests them with added significance, expanding the festival so that it also (not “instead’) commemorates spiritual deliverance from sin. This expansion anticipates the full and final deliverance as well; as Paul says, “you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes” (1 Cor 11:26).144

 

 In 1 Cor 11, Paul deals specifically with this extended part of the Passover liturgy (which is the least established at this point). Paul’s emphasis is not on the identification of the bread and wine with Jesus’ body and blood (which he omits), nor even on the eating and drinking alone, but on the combination of doing and reviewing (“do this in remembrance of me,” 1 Cor 11:24-25, cf. v. 26).145

 

1 Cor 11:27 Therefore, whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of sinning against the body and blood of the Lord. 28 A man ought to examine himself before he eats of the bread and drinks of the cup. 29 For anyone who eats and drinks without recognizing the body of the Lord eats and drinks judgment on himself. 30 That is why many among you are weak and sick, and a number of you have fallen asleep. 31 But if we judged ourselves, we would not come under judgment. 32 When we are judged by the Lord, we are being disciplined so that we will not be condemned with the world. 33 So then, my brothers, when you come together to eat, wait for each other. 34 If anyone is hungry, he should eat at home, so that when you meet together it may not result in judgment. And when I come I will give further directions.

 

                   3.             There are severe penalties against their incorrect observance (vv.

27-34).

a.     They must exercise self-judgment.

       If they do not, they will suffer God’s judgment..

b.    They must exercise self-control.

       If they will not, they should eat before coming.

 

Comment: About “…in an unworthy manner” (v. 27)

 Most think this phrase refers to the person doing the eating. “People are ‘unworthy’ if they have any sin in their lives, or have committed sins during the past week” (Fee 1987:560). This interpretation of v. 27 affects the application of v. 28, making self-examination personal and introspective in an attempt to become worthy to participate without falling under judgment.

           

The phrase does not refer to the inner condition of the person eating, though, but to the outward way he eats; in short, his table manners. Hence, the examination Paul advocates in v. 28 is not to determine whether the person is worthy to eat, but whether he is eating in a worthy manner. Paul is not saying: “You cannot participate until you get rid of the sin in your life”—rather—“In your participation, are you divided, disorderly, drunk, disregarding the needs of others?” Do you see the distinction?146

 

 Paul charges the Corinthians with impropriety in their observance of Passover and Communion.

         Their division is contrary to the unity that should characterize the celebration of corporate deliverance.

         Their disorder disrupts the retelling of the God’s saving acts.

         Their drunkenness makes a mockery of what should be a festive yet dignified commemoration.

         Their disregard for others betrays an absence of love among those who are supposed to be known for that virtue.

Paul reviews the tradition he has received concerning Jesus’ expansion of the seder and puts them on notice that their impropriety is an offense against Jesus and is the cause of God’s judgment against them. He then commands the Corinthians to straighten up.

         If they do not exercise self-judgment in these areas, they will continue to suffer God’s judgment.

         If they cannot exercise self-control during the seder, they must eat at home before they come.

Paul wants them to restore the dignity and sanctity of the service, without which their meetings “do more harm than good” (v. 17).

 

Application: To what extent do Paul’s instructions apply to the church today, given its abbreviated communion service?147 [Treat separately if appropriate.] Division? Disorder? Drunkenness? Disregard? Are Paul’s instructions for communion culturally bound, like his instructions on head coverings, or is our practice of communion biblically deficient? Are we missing something by truncating the service?