Showing posts with label Theology: Ethics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Theology: Ethics. Show all posts

Friday, July 1, 2022

Is Abortion a Capital Offense?

 

Is abortion a capital offense?

Dr. Paul Manuel—2010 revised 2022

 

     Some ethical questions arise from contemporary events, especially as the ethics of one issue may clash with the ethics of another issue. For instance…

Was Scott Roeder justified in killing Dr. George Tiller?

Such was Roeder’s claim in response to the many abortions Dr. Tiller performed. Nevertheless, God does not address the issue of abortion directly, let alone describe it as murder, and His law makes no special provision for the unborn, despite their so-called “innocence.”[1]

 

     The prohibition against murder (e.g., in the Decalogue) does not pertain to abortion;[2] it pertains to the homicide of an adult.[3] The death sentence for other crimes illustrates the point. In none of them that involves a woman is the possibility of her pregnancy a mitigating factor in her judgment, and the penalty accords no immunity to an unborn child.

 

         Adultery

If a man commits adultery with another man’s wife…both the adulterer and the adulteress must be put to death. (Lev 20:10)

         Immorality

Moses was angry with the officers of the army…who returned from the battle. “Have you allowed all the women to live?” he asked them. “They were those who followed Balaam’s advice and were the means of turning the Israelites away from the LORD in what happened at Peor, so….kill every woman who has slept with a man. (Num 31:14-17)

         Idolatry[4]

At that time we took all his towns and completely destroyed them—men, women, and children. We left no survivors. (Deut 2:34)

We completely destroyed them, as we had done with Sihon king of Heshbon, destroying every city—men, women, and children. (Deut 3:6)

These last passages also show that the sixth command does not apply to infanticide (Manuel 2006). A child is not immune from suffering for the sins of the parents.[5]

 

     The term “right to life” may be relevant politically, as a reference to the “life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness” clause in the Declaration of Independence, but it has no relevance biblically. The only “right” God promises us is to a fair trial.

For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, that each one may receive what is due him for the things done while in the body, whether good or bad. (2 Cor 5:10)

To assert that the unborn should have the same legal protection as adults (e.g., in the sixth commandment) goes “beyond what is written” (1 Cor 4:6). God makes no such declaration.

 

     There are passages that speak about God’s involvement in prenatal development and birth:

I am fearfully and wonderfully made; Your works are wonderful, I know that full well. You created my inmost being; You knit me together in my mother’s womb…. I was woven together in the depths of the earth…Your eyes saw my unformed body. (Ps 139:14-16)

There are also passages that indicate His plan for certain unborn children:

Your name will be Abraham, for I have made you a father of many nations… You must keep My covenant, you and your descendants after you for the generations to come. (Gen 17:5, 9)

Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I set you apart; I appointed you as a prophet to the nations. (Jer 1:5)

It does not follow, however, that the unborn have any special status or protection from God. Only widows, orphans, and resident aliens can make such a claim and can point to legislation for that purpose.[6]

 

     A common assumption of Christians who hold a pro-life position is that they represent God’s perspective and that He values life above all else. Were that the case, He would not assign the death penalty to crimes such as adultery, immorality, and idolatry. That He does require execution in those cases demonstrates that the highest value in God’s economy is not life but holiness, which derives from obedience. Holiness is God’s preeminent attribute, being the divine trait man must emulate above all others. As He says through Moses:

I am the LORD your God; consecrate yourselves and be holy, because I am holy. (Lev 11:44)

Be holy because I, the LORD your God, am holy. (Lev 19:2)

You are to be holy to Me because I, the LORD, am holy, and I have set you apart from the nations to be My own. (Lev 20:26)

This entails a radical revision of priorities. It means ordering our lives according to His perfect standard versus personal gratification, ever mindful of the difference between God and us. As He says through Isaiah:

My thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways My ways…. 9 As the heavens are higher than the earth, so are My ways higher than your ways and My thoughts than your thoughts. (Isa 55:8)

That difference may be why His actions are difficult to understand, such as when He prescribes the abortive death of unborn children, something pro-life advocates are hard pressed to accept.

 

     In a sense, those who claim to be pro-choice have taken a more biblical title (not a more biblical position), because God does allow man to choose (Manuel 2020). The problem with the pro-choice movement is that it applies the title late in the decision-making process, after people have made the more important decision, the one that results in conceiving a child.[7] That choice, especially as it pertains to the vast majority of abortions, almost 75% of which involve unmarried women,[8] offers a more biblically defensible point of opposition. That is, pro-life advocates would be on firmer scriptural ground by concentrating on the prevention of unintended conception[9] and by streamlining the process of adoption.

 

     Was Scott Roeder justified in killing Dr. George Tiller? No, Scott Roeder was not justified in killing Dr. George Tiller. Far from upholding the biblical prohibition against homicide (by action he was not authorized to take), Mr. Roeder was guilty of transgressing the very prohibition he claimed to defend and was deserving of the penalty that violation carries, despite the doctor’s horrific record. In fact, Mr. Roeder’s sentence of life in prison is far more lenient than he deserves.

 

    Abortion is not a capital offense, nor is it a violation of the sixth commandment, which applies to the unlawful termination of a life already born. It is, however, a potential affront to God’s holiness, subject to His judgment, and “it is a dreadful thing to fall into the hands of the living God” (Heb 10:31).

 

 

Bibliography

 

Manuel, Paul http://paulwmanuel.blogspot.com

     2006       “On Hostility” (Exod 20:13), a sermon in the series The Decalogue: A Summary of God’s Precepts for God’s People.

     2009       “Understanding What God Has Said: A Mini-Course in How to Discover What a Biblical Passage Means.”

     2020       An Essay about Free Will: Man’s Will and God’s Will, Complimentary or                              Contradictory


[1]In support of their position, pro-life advocates often appeal to a passage that allegedly accords a fetus the same status and legal rights as the mother.

Exod 21:22 If men who are fighting hit a pregnant woman and she gives birth prematurely but there is no serious injury, the offender must be fined whatever the woman’s husband demands and the court allows. 23 But if there is serious injury, you are to take life for life, 24 eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, 25 burn for burn, wound for wound, bruise for bruise.

It is unclear in this passage if the “serious injury” that requires compensation is to the mother or to her unborn child. For pro-life advocates to make their assertion (of the latter) violates an important hermeneutical principle:

      Do not base doctrine on a single passage, especially if it is unclear (see Manuel 2009, n. 158).

A parallel statute in another code (with many similarities to Mosaic law) removes the ambiguity.

Code of Hammurabi (c. 1700) 209 If a man struck another man’s daughter and has caused her to have a miscarriage, he shall pay ten shekels of silver for her fetus. 210 If that woman has died, they shall put his daughter to death.

The death of the fetus is subject to a fine; only the mother’s death is a capital offense, and that is likely the situation in Exod 21 as well.

        In any case, the stated punishment (“eye for eye”) occurs in two other instances of conflict between adults that result in injury, and both apply to the offending adult.

Lev 14:19 If anyone injures his neighbor, whatever he has done must be done to him: 20a fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth.

Deut 19:16 If a malicious witness takes the stand to accuse a man of a crime…. 19 then do to him as he intended to do to his brother. You must purge the evil from among you…. 21 Show no pity: life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot.

[2]For treatment of this and other misapplications of the sixth Decalogue commandment, see Manuel 2006.

[3]There is no evidence that God’s people understood the precept to have wider application. All specific cases in scripture involve adults.

[4]Hosea presents an especially graphic declaration of judgment.

Hos 13:16 The people of Samaria must bear their guilt, because they have rebelled against their God. They will fall by the sword; their little ones will be dashed to the ground, their pregnant women ripped open.

[5]The most famous case is that of David’s son.

2 Sam 12:15 …the LORD struck the child that Uriah’s wife had borne to David, and he became ill…. 18a On the seventh day the child died.

Cf. Exod 20:5 …I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the fathers

The state of David’s child, innocent or not, was immaterial to the judgment God prescribed.

      Children may suffer for their parents’ sin, which often has repercussions long after the original perpetrators are gone, such as the product of an illicit sexual union. Nevertheless, each person is generally responsible for his own sin.

Exod 20:5 I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the fathers to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me.

Num 14:18 He punishes the children for the sin of the fathers to the third and fourth generation.

Deut 24:16 Fathers shall not be put to death for their children, nor children put to death for their fathers; each is to die for his own sin.

[6]God makes special provision for the needy:

Deut 14:29 The aliens, the fatherless and the widows who live in your towns may come and eat and be satisfied, and so that the LORD your God may bless you in all the work of your hands.

Ps 68:5 A father to the fatherless, a defender of widows, is God in his holy dwelling

Isa 9:17 Therefore the Lord will take no pleasure in the young men, nor will he pity the fatherless and widows.

Mal 3:5 I will come near to you for judgment. I will be quick to testify against sorcerers, adulterers and perjurers, against those who defraud laborers of their wages, who oppress the widows and the fatherless, and deprive aliens of justice, but do not fear me,” says the LORD Almighty.

Jms 1:27 Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world.

[7]Ronald Regan said, “I've noticed that everyone who is for abortion has already been born.”

[8]This statistic is from “Abortion Facts” at The Center for Bio-Ethical Reform website (www.abortionno.org/Resources/fastfacts.htm).

[9]A recent study funded by the National Institute of Mental Health showed the success of an abstinence-only program of sex education for adolescents.

Wednesday, November 9, 2016

Jesus on divorce (Matthew 5)

JESUS ON DIVORCE IN MATT 5
Adapted from "Matthew: The Rabbinic Gospel."
Dr. Paul Manuel—1998

In Matt 5, Jesus contrasts a popular but superficial understanding of the Mosaic law on divorce ("It has been said") with the divine intention that stands behind the law ("But I tell you").
Matt 5:31 "It has been said, 'Anyone who divorces his wife must give her a certificate of divorce.' 32 But I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for marital unfaithfulness, causes her to become an adulteress, and anyone who marries the divorced woman commits adultery.
The precept states that divorce requires a certificate, which some took to be the only requirement.
Deut 24:1 If a man marries a woman who becomes displeasing to him because he finds something indecent about her, and he writes her a certificate of divorce, gives it to her and sends her from his house...
In conjunction with a liberal interpretation of the term "indecent," certain men thought they could issue such a document on any grounds, but Jesus states that the certificate is valid only if the wife has been unfaithful.

Sunday, July 10, 2016

Is God a pacifist?

A MATTER OF SELF DEFENSE
Dr. Paul Manuel—2016
Some people think the God of the Old Testament was different from the God of the New Testament, that the former was vengeful whereas the latter is merciful, that the God of Jews was characterized by wrath but the God of Christians is characterized by love. Some Christians think that the Father of Jesus (even Jesus himself) is actually a pacifist and that Christians should be pacifists as well. Even if one bifurcates the Old Testament and the New Testament, their respective pictures of God's character are not different. The Bible as a whole, Old Testament and New Testament together, presents a unified description of God. He has always condemned wickedness and commended righteousness. His disposition toward mankind has never changed. His essential character is immutable:
He who is the Glory of Israel does not...change his mind; for he is not a man, that he should change his mind. (1 Sam 15:29)
Every good and perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of the heavenly lights, who does not change like shifting shadows. (James 1:17)
It is to our eternal advantage that God and His dealings with man do not change so that we, like Israel, "are not destroyed" (Mal 3:6).1

The supposition that He has changed, that He has perhaps mellowed with age, fails to recognize that the Bible as a whole presents a consistent picture of God, that the character He displays in the Old Testament is no different from the character He displays in the New Testament. God responds to man appropriately whatever his situation. While the reader will find a constant view of God throughout the Bible, he must always be cognizant of context, recognizing that God's revelation may pertain to a specific setting and not be universal, applicable to all circumstances.2

The Bible does not say much about self-defense,3 but there are a few passages that suggest some general principles. While it is preferable "as far as it depends on you, [to] live at peace with everyone" (Rom 12:18), that is not always possible, and you may need to act in response to an attack.
  • Principle: The child of God must preserve his own life.
Case #1: A possible thief versus a vulnerable homeowner
If a thief is caught breaking in and is struck so that he dies, the defender is not guilty of bloodshed; but if it happens after sunrise, he is guilty of bloodshed (Exod 22:2-3a).
When an intruder's intention is unknown or unknowable (i.e., whether to rob or to assault), in this case because of darkness, deadly force is warranted. In daylight an intruder's motive is ostensibly clear.4 Presumably a homeowner may still resist a thief and protect his property5 but may not kill him, because the threat is not to the homeowner personally.6

Monday, July 4, 2016

Sermon: A fence of abstinence (Jer 35:1-19)

A FENCE OF ABSTINENCE (Jer 35)
Dr. Paul Manuel—2016

Children depend on their parents for many things, from basic necessities (e.g., food, clothing, shelter) to basic guidance in understanding the world.
A father and son went fishing one day. After a couple hours out in the boat, the boy suddenly became curious about the world around him. He asked his father, "How does this boat float?" The father thought for a moment, then replied, "I don't rightly know, son." The boy returned to his contemplation, then turned back to his father, "How do fish breath underwater?" Once again the father replied, "Don't rightly know, son." A little later the boy asked his father, "Why is the sky blue?" Again, the father replied. "Don't rightly know, son." Worried he was going to annoy his father, he says, "Dad, do you mind my asking you all of these questions?" "Of course not, son. If you don't ask questions...you'll never learn anything!"
Children depend on their parents for many things. Even adult children can benefit from their parents' guidance, as the children of Recab do in erecting A Fence of Abstinence.

The prophet Jeremiah ministered at the end of Judah's existence as a nation. He started his service in the royal court at a high point in the country's history, during the reign of King Josiah, Judah's greatest reformer. Jeremiah remained in the royal court through the next four monarchs, all of whom did "evil in the eyes of the Lord" (2 Kgs 23:32, 37; 24:9, 19), until Babylonian forces invaded for the last time, destroying the temple and the capital city. During the reign of the second of Judah's last four kings, the prophet encourages the people's faithfulness to their heavenly father with an example of one family's faithfulness to its earthly father. Jeremiah begins by examining...

I. A Family Tradition (Jer 35:1-11)
A. The prophet tests the Recabites' loyalty to their father (Jer 35:1-5).
Jer 35:1 This is the word that came to Jeremiah from the LORD during the reign of Jehoiakim son of Josiah king of Judah: 2 "Go to the Recabite family and invite them to come to one of the side rooms of the house of the LORD and give them wine to drink." 3 So I went to get Jaazaniah son of Jeremiah, the son of Habazziniah, and his brothers and all his sons—the whole family of the Recabites.1 4 I brought them into the house of the LORD, into the room of the sons of Hanan son of Igdaliah the man of God.2 It was next to the room of the officials, which was over that of Maaseiah son of Shallum the doorkeeper. 5 Then I set bowls full of wine and some cups before the men of the Recabite family and said to them, "Drink some wine."
The Lord's instructions to Jeremiah were quite simple: Invite the Racabite family to dinner and serve them wine. However unusual it may have been to receive a dinner invitation from the prophet, there was nothing unusual about the menu. God left the food choice to Jeremiah—presumably, he would serve nothing unclean. The only item God specified was the beverage, a common one at middle eastern meals.3

Sunday, August 23, 2015

Divorce and remarriage

Divorce and Remarriage
Dr. Paul Manuel—2015

The prevalence of divorce and remarriage in our society has not left the church untouched. Most congregations include members or constituents whose families have undergone restructuring. Nevertheless, some Christians condemn all divorce and remarriage, appealing to Jesus’ statements, such as the one in Mark’s gospel:1
Anyone who divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery against her. (Mark 10:11)
However attractive it may be to have a clear delineation of right and wrong, few issues lend themselves to either-or categories, and any treatment of marital relationships must include other passages in the biblical text that argue for a more nuanced position or that offer more information.2 The parallel account in Matthew, for example, has a more complete transcript of Jesus’ words:3
Anyone who divorces his wife, except for marital unfaithfulness, and marries another woman commits adultery. (Matt 19:9)
In light of the limited information these few passages offer, therefore, it is necessary to conduct a broader survey to understand God’s perspective on the issues of divorce and remarriage.

I. Divorce
A. According to Moses
When God instituted marriage, His intention was that it be permanent. Some Pharisees question Jesus on this matter, and he refers them to Genesis:4
“Haven’t you read,” he replied, “that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’ [Gen 1:27] and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’ [Gen 2:24]? So they are no longer two, but one. Therefore what God has joined together, let man not separate.” (Matt 19:4-6)
They press him further, and Jesus indicates that God allowed divorce as a concession to man’s sinful nature:5
“Why then,” they asked, “did Moses command that a man give his wife a certificate of divorce and send her away?” Jesus replied, “Moses permitted you to divorce your wives because your hearts were hard. But it was not this way from the beginning.” (Matt 19:7-8)
Jesus acknowledges that sin has altered the edenic model of marriage and that the original permanence of the union is subject to revision. The contrast here is between God’s perfect will and His permissive will, between what He approves and what He allows (so also Davies 1997:14).6 On the one hand, God states, “I hate divorce” (Mal 2:16), but, on the other hand, He speaks about divorcing Israel for the nation’s unfaithfulness.7 God recognizes that a marriage might fail because one or both parties undermine it.8 So as not to make a bad situation worse, He provides for the formal dissolution of a marriage contract through the issuing of a “certificate of divorce,” called a get:9

Friday, June 6, 2014

Peace

WHAT DOES THE BIBLE MEAN BY THE WORD "PEACE"?
Dr. Paul Manuel—2001
pdf


Because of the length of this study most of it is available only in this pdf.

Contents

I. Semantic Range of "Peace" in the Bible     2
A. The Hebrew verb
B. The Hebrew noun
C. The Greek verb
D. The Greek noun
II. Common Uses of "Peace" in the Bible
A. Relational Peace
  1. Interpersonal: harmony between individuals      8
  2. International: freedom from war     13
B. Personal Peace
  1. Physical: welfare, health, prosperity      22
  2. Mental: tranquility, confidence, contentment      27
Appendix: of "Other Verses"      31
Bibliography      47
Endnotes      48

After the terrorist attacks on September 11, the notion of peace has come under considerable scrutiny. What is it, and what price are we willing to pay for it? How do we achieve it? ...What comes to mind when you think of "peace"? The Oxford American Dictionary gives five uses of the word in American English (Ehrlich 1980:491):
  1. A state of freedom from war, cessation of war
  2. A treaty ending a war
  3. Freedom from civil disorder
  4. Quiet, calm, freedom from anxiety
  5. A state of harmony between people, absence of strife
In almost all cases, we use "peace" to mean the absence of something bad: war, disorder, anxiety, strife.

For example, on the international level, peace is the absence of war between otherwise hostile countries, and we label relationships accordingly. Sometimes, peace is not the right term, such as in characterizing our relationship with England. In that case, we say that Great Britain is "a friend" of the US rather than that Great Britain is "at peace" with the US, because the phrase "at peace" does not convey the close ties our country enjoys with England. On the other hand, "at peace" would be an accurate description of our relationship to the Soviet Union, at least before perestroika.

The Greek word for peace is eirene (irenic [adj.] "promoting peace", Irene [PN]). It means much the same as our English word: the absence of conflict. In biblical literature, however, the Greek word comes under the influence of its Hebrew counterpart shalom and the meaning—at least in the LXX and New Testament documents—takes on the significance of the word in the Hebrew Old Testament (Carr 1980 2:931; Beck 1976 2:780; Foerster 1964a 2:406). We will begin with a general survey and ask the question: How does the biblical definition of peace compare with the modern definition?

There is both a verb form and a noun form of this word in Hebrew and Greek. We will focus on the noun, but to show you the similarities I will list the major uses of the verb.1 ....

For the Study (46 pages) and its Bibliography and Endnotes, see the pdf here.

Thursday, June 5, 2014

Standing up to peer pressure

SERMONS FROM GENESIS:
PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS OF PEER PRESSURE (Gen 6:5-6, 8-9) 
Dr. Paul Manuel—Scout Sabbath—2007

Because we have several additional young people here this morning, I thought it would be a good opportunity for the rest of you to impress them with your biblical knowledge, so that they could see what you have learned in your many years of study. To that end, I am going to give the adults here a brief quiz, just nine questions. You can jot the answers on the back of the sermon outline.
Q: What was Noah's occupation? ...Was he a farmer, a bricklayer, or something else?
A: He was an arkitecht.

Q. Why was Noah the greatest financier in the Bible?
A. He was floating his stock while everyone else was in liquidation.

Q: What was the name of Noah's wife? (This is really trivia.)
A: Joan of Ark

Q: While Noah was on the ark, why did he not spend time fishing?
A: He only had two worms.

Q: Why did those two worms not get on the ark in an apple?
A: Because everyone had to go on in pairs (pears)

Q: Where did Noah keep the bees?
A: In an ark-hive

Q: How did Noah keep track of the animals at night?
A: He used floodlights.

Q: What is the one tool Noah wished he had during the construction?
A: An ark-welder.

Q: What was Noah's theme song?
A: "Raindrops Keep Falling On My Head"
However difficult you may have found the questions of that quiz, it was nothing to what Noah faced, even before the flood, as he encountered the Problems and Prospects of Peer Pressure.

After God created the world, people did what most people do, and the Bible records some of what that entailed. They had jobs, got married, and raised families, but life was not always smooth.1
  • Adam and Eve were expelled from the Garden of Eden for their disobedience.
  • Cain, angry that God rejected his offering but accepted his brother's offering, murdered his brother Abel.
  • Lamach, one of Cain's descendants, was an even more violent man and boasted about having killed many people.
To be sure, there were some bright spots in man's early history.2
  • Seth and his son Enosh seem to have started a trend as "men began to call on the name of the LORD" (Gen 4:26b).
  • Their descendant Enoch is recorded to have had an especially close relationship to God for "300 years" (Gen 5:22a).
The general direction of society, though, is downward, away from God, as people grow more completely sinful. After several generations, man's wickedness hits bottom. Please turn to Gen 6, where we read that by then...

Tuesday, April 29, 2014

Christian ethics

BIBLICALLY CORRECT:
APPLYING RELIGIOUS PRINCIPLES IN THE REAL WORLD
—TRAINING CHRISTIANS FOR TOUGH CHOICES
Dr. Paul Manuel—2002

The following study was one of the most engaging and entertaining I have taught. Unfortunately, it was also one of the most demanding of student participation. Consequently, I was not able to go as far as I had hoped. ....I was able to cover the practice cases but not move on to current problems. I had hoped to return to it one day, perhaps with a different study group but, alas, that was not to be. What I did manage to complete can stand alone....

(This study is lengthy so I have not reproduced it on this site. It can be downloaded as a pdf here. The Table of Contents is below.)

I. Introduction
The Case of the Negligent Neighbor
     Chart: Assessing the Strength of Your Convictions
II. Practice Cases1
A. The Case of the Mangled Monkey 12
     Chart: How to Make a Moral Decision
     Chart: Old Artifacts with New Associations
B. The Case of the Devastated Detective 19
C. The Case of the Family Feud 23
D. The Case of the Immodest Model 28
E. The Case of the Dissenting Deacon 32
F. The Case of the Filched Final 36
G. The Case of the Gambling Guardian 40
H. The Case of the Trusting Trimbles 46
I. The Case of the Persecuted Pressman 50
J. The Case of the Dubious Detergent 56
K. The Case of the Liberated Leader 62
III. Conclusion 67
Bibliography 68
Endnotes 70

For the Complete Study (93 pages), see the pdf here.

Thursday, April 3, 2014

The pressure to conform

PEER AND OTHER PRESSURES
Dr. Paul Manuel—2007

How independent are you? Are the decisions you make or the opinions you hold yours alone, or are they influenced (even coerced) by others, a person or a group whose approval you hope to win or whose support you think you need? There are many people who might have you behave or believe in a certain way, not because it is in your best interest but because it benefits them, supporting their agenda or simply demonstrating their power over others. Such pressures come in various forms and from various sources, but they often have the same purpose: influencing you in a way that is not necessarily to your benefit. To examples in scripture of such pressure, people have responded variously.

I. Peer pressure
A. In response to pressure from other prophets to misrepresent God, Micaiah resisted (1 Kgs 22:13-14).
1 Kgs 22:13 The messenger who had gone to summon Micaiah said to him, "Look, as one man the other prophets are predicting success for the king. Let your word agree with theirs, and speak favorably." 14 But Micaiah said, "As surely as the LORD lives, I can tell him only what the LORD tells me."
B. In response to pressure from other prophets to misrepresent God, Micah resisted (Mic 2:6).
Mic 2:6 "Do not prophesy," their prophets say. "Do not prophesy about these things; disgrace will not overtake us."
C. In response to pressure from other religious leaders to misrepresent God, Jeremiah resisted (Jer 26:11-13).1
Jer 26:11 Then the priests and the prophets said to the officials and all the people, "This man should be sentenced to death because he has prophesied against this city. You have heard it with your own ears!" 12 Then Jeremiah said to all the officials and all the people: "The LORD sent me to prophesy against this house and this city all the things you have heard. 13 Now reform your ways and your actions and obey the LORD your God. Then the LORD will relent and not bring the disaster he has pronounced against you.

Friday, February 8, 2013

Homosexuality

HOMOSEXUALITY: AFFIRMING OUR BIBLICAL BEARINGS
pdf
Dr. Paul Manuel—2002

In a desire to be culturally relevant, churches have checked and sometimes changed their views on various issues (e.g., divorce, women in ministry). One issue that has generated both discussion and division is sexuality, particularly homosexuality. Several mainline denominations have adopted positive positions on this activity and on relations with practicing homosexuals, from admitting them into membership to ordaining them for ministry.

Where these same denominations address what God has said about the matter, it is either to revise or reject what the Bible teaches.
  • Revision: The Bible's condemnation of homosexuality refers only to those relationships that are unloving or unfaithful.
  • Rejection: The Bible's condemnation of homosexuality is outmoded and does not apply in modern society.
While the church should attempt to reach all segments of society, the church must not condone (explicitly or implicitly) what God condemns.

Friday, November 30, 2012

Is lying always wrong?

Deception in the Bible: Is Lying Always Wrong?

(July 2000; revised March 2010)
This document is available as a pdf here

When we deal with ethical questions—what is right as opposed to what is wrong—we prefer clarity to ambiguity. We want a firm distinction between what a person should do and what he should not do. We get that clarity when God unequivocally condemns certain behavior, acts such as...1
  • Pagan idolatry, 
  • Premeditated murder, 
  • Sexual immorality. 
These issues brook no exception. They are always wrong. The Bible also condemns deceit.2 God says in...
Lev 19:11b-c Do not lie. Do not deceive one another.
Can we also make the same assertion that—like idolatry, murder, and immorality— deceit "is always condemned in Scripture" (italics added; so Barker 1975:84)?3

We all agree that our Lord is "the God of truth" (Ps 31:5b), who values truth and speaks the truth.4 He denounces lying, especially the kind that turns people away from Him.5 Satan's rebellion can make headway only through deceptive means, which is why he is "the father of lies" (John 8:44).6 Truth is characteristic of the godly, whereas falsehood is characteristic of the ungodly.7 Moreover, God punishes those who lie, sometimes severely,8 and those who persist in such behavior disqualify themselves from entering His presence.9 This does not deny that "[s]ometimes even good men [can] become enmeshed in lies" (Foster 1975:926), as when Peter denied Jesus, nor does it excuse such behavior,10 but "it [is] the exception rather then the pattern of their lives" (ibid.). What is troubling and confusing to us are the examples of deception in the Bible that have God's approval. How are we to understand them in light of His repeated prohibition against lying?

Is lying always wrong, or does God seem to allow it under certain circumstances? Most of the relevant passages fall into one of three groups, so we will examine each group in turn to see what light they shed on this subject.