Monday, February 27, 2023

Conflict Management - 1 Corinthians 7:1-40

 

Lesson 7: The Church’s Questions—Marriage

 

 In chapters 1-6 of 1 Cor, Paul answers questions the church is not asking. These were problems he had to address—division, discipline, lawsuits, immorality—all matters Paul could not ignore. Not only did they evince the improper behavior of certain congregants, such behavior was having a detrimental affect on the church’s testimony in the community.

 In chapter 7, the apostle turns to questions the church is asking. The first is whether or not a believer should marry. Some people today think that Paul was a misogynist—not a massage therapist but a woman hater—that he regarded the opposite sex as a necessity yet also a nuisance, and that he considered marriage to be a wasteful endeavor.54 If you have read the passage already, you may have noticed that Paul takes a rather utilitarian view of this relationship (although he could simply be responding to their wording of the question in v. 1b, which may reflect the tendency among some toward asceticism). That is, Paul’s primary determinant to marry or not is the ability or inability to control one’s sexual passions (which he clearly reserves for the context of marriage).55 This may seem a bit crass to the modern reader—surely, there are other, more altruistic, reasons to marry (love?)—but keep in mind that Paul offers his advice with a view toward the believer’s and the church’s eschatological role in God’s plan, which could immerge quite soon. We will return to that later.

 Throughout the chapter, Paul contrasts the preferred status with the permitted status,56 what is better with what is good. We will follow this line of reasoning as we go through the material, looking for these two positions at each juncture in order to understand how Paul is advising the Corinthian church. Toward the end, we will consider how much of his counsel is relevant for believers today. We begin with Paul’s opening statement in vv. 1-7.

 

 III.       Church’s Questions       7:1-16:9

             A. Marriage         7:1-40

 

1 Cor 7:1 Now for the matters you wrote about: It is good for a man not to marry. 2 But since there is so much immorality, each man should have his own wife, and each woman her own husband. 3 The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband. 4 The wife's body does not belong to her alone but also to her husband. In the same way, the husband's body does not belong to him alone but also to his wife. 5 Do not deprive each other except by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer. Then come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control. 6 I say this as a concession, not as a command. 7 I wish that all men were as I am. But each man has his own gift from God; one has this gift, another has that.


 8 Now to the unmarried and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I am. 9 But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion. 10 To the married I give this command (not I, but the Lord): A wife must not separate from her husband. 11 But if she does, she must remain unmarried or else be reconciled to her husband. And a husband must not divorce his wife.  12 To the rest I say this (I, not the Lord): If any brother has a wife who is not a believer and she is willing to live with him, he must not divorce her. 13 And if a woman has a husband who is not a believer and he is willing to live with her, she must not divorce him. 14 For the unbelieving husband has been sanctified through his wife, and the unbelieving wife has been sanctified through her believing husband. Otherwise your children would be unclean, but as it is, they are holy. 15 But if the unbeliever leaves, let him do so. A believing man or woman is not bound in such circumstances; God has called us to live in peace. 16 How do you know, wife, whether you will save your husband? Or, how do you know, husband, whether you will save your wife?

 17 Nevertheless, each one should retain the place in life that the Lord assigned to him and to which God has called him. This is the rule I lay down in all the churches. 18 Was a man already circumcised when he was called? He should not become uncircumcised. Was a man uncircumcised when he was called? He should not be circumcised. 19 Circumcision is nothing and uncircumcision is nothing. Keeping God's commands is what counts. 20 Each one should remain in the situation which he was in when God called him. 21 Were you a slave when you were called? Don't let it trouble you— although if you can gain your freedom, do so. 22 For he who was a slave when he was called by the Lord is the Lord's freedman; similarly, he who was a free man when he was called is Christ's slave. 23 You were bought at a price; do not become slaves of men. 24 Brothers, each man, as responsible to God, should remain in the situation God called him to.  

1.        To the believers in general (vv. 1-7)

a.     The preferred status is to be unmarried.57            • No reason given (although v. 7a; cf. 4:16)

b.    The permitted status is to be married.58

       To avoid immorality

2.        To the unmarried and widows (vv. 8-9)59

a.     The preferred status is to be unmarried.

       No reason given (although v. 8b)

b.    The permitted status is to be married.

       To avoid immorality

3.        To the believers married (vv. 10-11)60

a.     The preferred status is to remain married.61

       Jesus commanded it.62

b.    The permitted status is to be separated.

       No reason given

           

Conflict Management: Cultivating Concord in the Church at Corinth

4.        To the mixed married (vv. 12-16)

a.     The preferred status is to remain married.

       The unbeliever is sanctified (cf. comment).

b.    The permitted status is to be separated.

       Salvation is not guaranteed.

 

Comment: About “so that Satan will not tempt you” (v. 5)

 Some married couples at Corinth may have been abstaining from sexual intimacy to devote themselves more fully to ministry in the church (as Paul recommends later in the chapter). He advises them that such self-denial may be appropriate for a time (“so that you may devote yourselves to prayer”) but can become counter-productive if prolonged.

 

Comment: About “…has been sanctified” (v. 14)

 The short answer (with long footnotes): God does not sanction mixed marriages (i.e., those that begin mixed). Quite the contrary, He prohibits them, because they have had a detrimental affect on His people, turning them away from Him and compromising their holiness.63 Moreover, the offspring of such unions God regards as unholy.64 Here, however, Paul is addressing (gentile) marriages that become mixed when one party later comes to faith in God. Such unions God accepts (i.e., sanctifies) as long as the unbelieving party is willing to remain with the believing party, and their offspring He regards as holy.

 The long answer (with relatively short footnotes): Just as our associations can work to our disadvantage, as when we suffer because of the unrighteous company we keep,65 so there our associations may work to our advantage, as when we benefit by the righteous company we keep.66 Paul sees here not the danger of the unbeliever’s ‘defiling’ the believer but the possibility of the believer’s ‘sanctifying’ the unbeliever. The unbelieving spouse is set apart in a special way— perhaps by being exposed to the effects of salvation—that will, one hopes, lead to his or her conversion (v. 16; Fee 1987:301).67 Note, however, that Paul is speaking about marriages that become mixed not that begin mixed (vv. 12-13, cf. 17).68  Paul then says in v. 14 if God did not recognize as legitimate marriages that became mixed, the children of such unions would be illegitimate (“unclean”).69 Like the unbelieving spouse, however, those children are sanctified (“holy,” same root) and, presumably, have a greater opportunity to come to faith.70

 Paul continues his advice to those in mixed marriages with a general statement in v. 17: “…each one should retain the place in life that the Lord assigned to him…. This is the rule I lay down in all the churches.” He then applies the principle to circumcision, repeating the principle in v. 20, and applies it to slavery, restating the dictum yet again in v. 24.

 

Comment: About “not bound in such circumstances” (v. 15b)

 In the previous section, Paul (appealing to Jesus) permits the separation of husband and wife when both are believers but not their divorce.71 In this section, when only one party is a believer, he allows the unbelieving party to dissolve the marriage. Should that happen, the believing party is then free to remarry.

 

Comment: About “He should not become circumcised” (v. 18)

 Paul is not saying parents should no longer circumcise their sons. For Jews in the congregation, that would violate God’s command to Abraham and contradict Paul’s testimony in Jerusalem,72 as well as make the second part of his statement here nonsensical. “To be circumcised is to keep the commandment of God” (Fee 1987:313).

 Paul is speaking to adult men. He tells those who had been circumcised as infants not to interpret their freedom in the messiah as license to forsake their responsibility as Jews by attempting to reverse the surgical procedure.73 Likewise, those who had not been circumcised as infants should not think that their new relationship to the messiah requires that they undergo complete conversion to Judaism.74 One can be a Christian in either situation, circumcised or uncircumcised.

 

1 Cor 7:25 Now about virgins: I have no command from the Lord, but I give a judgment as one who by the Lord's mercy is trustworthy. 26 Because of the present crisis, I think that it is good for you to remain as you are. 27 Are you married? Do not seek a divorce. Are you unmarried? Do not look for a wife. 28 But if you do marry, you have not sinned; and if a virgin marries, she has not sinned. But those who marry will face many troubles in this life, and I want to spare you this.

 29 What I mean, brothers, is that the time is short. From now on those who have wives should live as if they had none; 30 those who mourn, as if they did not; those who are happy, as if they were not; those who buy something, as if it were not theirs to keep; 31 those who use the things of the world, as if not engrossed in them. For this world in its present form is passing away.

 32 I would like you to be free from concern. An unmarried man is concerned about the Lord's affairs—how he can please the Lord. 33 But a married man is concerned about the affairs of this world—how he can please his wife—34 and his interests are divided. An unmarried woman or virgin is concerned about the Lord's affairs: Her aim is to be devoted to the Lord in both body and spirit. But a married woman is concerned about the affairs of this world—how she can please her husband. 35 I am saying this for your own good, not to restrict you, but that you may live in a right way in undivided devotion to the Lord.

             

Conflict Management: Cultivating Concord in the Church at Corinth

 36 If anyone thinks he is acting improperly toward the virgin he is engaged to, and if she is getting along in years and he feels he ought to marry, he should do as he wants. He is not sinning. They should get married. 37 But the man who has settled the matter in his own mind, who is under no compulsion but has control over his own will, and who has made up his mind not to marry the virgin—this man also does the right thing. 38 So then, he who marries the virgin does right, but he who does not marry her does even better.  39 A woman is bound to her husband as long as he lives. But if her husband dies, she is free to marry anyone she wishes, but he must belong to the Lord. 40 In my judgment, she is happier if she stays as she is—and I think that I too have the Spirit of God.

 

                   5.     To the betrothed and unbetrothed(?) virgins (vv. 25-40)

a.     The preferred status is to remain unmarried.

1)    To spare undue hardship       2) To serve God completely

b.    The permitted status is to get married.

1)    To fulfill vow

2)    To avoid immorality75

 

Comment: About “…each man has his own gift from God” (v. 7b)

 In vv. 29-35, Paul reiterates the same eschatological perspective he mentioned earlier in the book, and he explains a statement he made earlier in the chapter, in v. 7b: “…each man has his own gift from God.” The Greek word for gift is ca¿risma, the same word for the endowments in chapter 12 that enable believers to heal, perform miracles, prophesy, etc. The value of these things that come to mind most readily as examples of spiritual gifts is on the horizontal plane. God gives them so that believers may minister to other people, most often, other believers.

 Paul says that singleness can also be counted among the spiritual gifts, because the single person, lacking the responsibilities that attend marriage, is free to minister in ways that a married person is not. As he summarizes the matter in v. 35, singleness allows a kind of “undivided devotion to the Lord” that is not possible for one who is married.76

 

Application: Is Paul’s advice to these groups still relevant today? How much of it? How can a person tell if he has the gift of being single?

 This is not a complete treatise on marriage or on the related subjects of sexuality, singleness, divorce, and remarriage. For a fuller picture of God’s will in these matters, we must consult additional passages.77 Paul is just answering questions the members of this church have raised. Nevertheless, what he says affirms the importance of this institution. God does not intend sexual relations for casual encounters but for the committed environment of marriage. Neither does He intend divorce to be an easy remedy for marital difficulties. For believers, remaining married is the preferred status to divorce.

 

 V. 17 contains the principle that Paul gives to the Corinthians, “…each one should retain the place in life that the Lord assigned to him and to which God has called him.” It is a principle that actually applies to any major decision. Paul is not suggesting that they give up bettering their lives. He is not speaking against career, educational, or economic advancement (v. 21b). He is saying that we should also make such determinations with an eye toward advancing God’s kingdom. In applying the principle to marriage, he advises that, without a compelling reason, those who are unmarried should remain so and those who are married should remain so. He cites one good reason for marriage in v. 9: “it is better to marry than to burn with passion.” What other good reasons might there be to marry?

 Paul is not, as some have claimed, against marriage (cf. Fee 1987:269).78 If he were, he would be telling those who are married to get divorced. He would also be opposing God’s evaluation in Gen 2:18, “It is not good for the man to be alone.” Rather, Paul recognizes two things:

         First, the institution of marriage is not for everyone. God gives some an ability to override the sexual urgency that compels so many others to the altar (v. 7). This gift allows them to devote themselves in God’s service to a degree that is not possible for those with marital responsibilities (v. 35).

         Not everyone, however, who is single is so because he or she has the gift Paul talks about. There are other reasons. For example, it is important for a believer to find a believing spouse, which severely reduces the pool of eligible candidates. In such cases, a person may want to get married but does not simply because he cannot find a suitable believing mate. Nevertheless, Paul’s first principle is still valid: The institution of marriage is not for everyone.

         Second, the institution of marriage is not forever. As Paul notes in v. 31, “…this world in its present form is passing away.” You may recall Jesus’ words, that, “[a]t the resurrection people will neither marry nor be given in marriage” (Matt 22:30). Therefore, the better course of action, if one possesses the gift, is to use it in complete devotion to serving God. The implication is that such commitment will have greater eternal significance.

         This does not mean that a person who is married cannot devote his life to God. Most pastors are devoted to God’s service (although their ability to minister is partially dependent on the commitment of their spouse), but their time is necessarily divided between pastoral duties and family responsibilities. Nevertheless, Paul’s second principle is also still valid: The institution of marriage is not forever.

Paul’s point is simply that there are advantages to remaining single in order to serve God, but he recognizes that celibacy is not for everybody.

Monday, February 20, 2023

Conflict Management - 1 Corinthians 6:12-20

 

Lesson 6: The Church’s Problems—Immorality

 

 On my first reading of this passage to prepare the lesson, it seemed that Paul was returning to the issue of chapter 5. Then I realized that although both sections deal with sexual sin,48 the former (chapter 5) involves only one congregant whereas the latter (chapter 6) seems to involve several congregants. What Paul is addressing is not the disciplining of one member but the lack of discipline among several members.

 

             D. Immorality     6:12-20

 

1 Cor 6:12 "Everything is permissible for me"—but not everything is beneficial. "Everything is permissible for me"—but I will not be mastered by anything. 13 "Food for the stomach and the stomach for food"—but God will destroy them both. The body is not meant for sexual immorality, but for the Lord, and the Lord for the body. 14 By his power God raised the Lord from the dead, and he will raise us also. 15 Do you not know that your bodies are members of Christ himself? Shall I then take the members of Christ and unite them with a prostitute? Never! 16 Do you not know that he who unites himself with a prostitute is one with her in body? For it is said, "The two will become one flesh." 17 But he who unites himself with the Lord is one with him in spirit.

 18 Flee from sexual immorality. All other sins a man commits are outside his body, but he who sins sexually sins against his own body. 19 Do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God? You are not your own; 20 you were bought at a price. Therefore honor God with your body.

 

1.        Symptom

       Visiting prostitutes (v. 15)

2.        Cause

       Pride (vv. 12, 19b)?

 

Comment: About “Everything is permissible for me” (v. 12)

 These are not Paul’s words. Rather, he is repeating the justification these individuals offer to other believers for their actions. (Hence, the NIV helpfully adds quotation marks.)

Apparently some men within the Christian community are going to [temple?] prostitutes and are arguing for the right to do so. Being people of the Spirit, they imply, has moved them to a higher plane, the realm of spirit, where they are unaffected by behavior that has merely to do with the body (Fee 1987:250-251).

Does this argument sound familiar? …Paul counters each of their generalizations with a contrasting argument.

           

—Immorality

         V. 12a Claim: Everything is permissible for me.

             Counterclaim: But not everything is beneficial.

         According to Paul: “Truly Christian conduct is not predicated on whether I have the right to do something, but [on] whether my conduct is helpful to those around me” (Fee 1987:252).

         V. 12b Claim: Everything is permissible for me.

           Counterclaim: But I will not be mastered by anything.

         Gaining the freedom to act as one pleases, without restraint, “is not freedom at all, but a form of bondage worse than before” (Fee 1987:252).49

         V. 13a Claim: Food for the stomach and the stomach for food, and God will destroy both the one (stomach) and the other (food).50

         This is a non-transferable concept that the Corinthians are attempting to transfer: “…since food is for the stomach and the stomach for food (after all, God will destroy them both in the end), and since all bodily appetites are pretty much alike, that means that the body is for sex and sex for the body” (Fee 1987:255). It sounds like: “Eat, drink, and be merry, for tomorrow we die.”51

  Counterclaim: But the body is meant for the Lord (not for immorality) and, rather than destroying it, God will raise it (as He raised Jesus).

 

                   3.    Solution

a.     Understand that the body is meant for the Lord, not for sexual immorality (v. 13).52

b.    Understand that the Lord will raise the body, not abandon it (v.

14).

c.     Understand that you must “honor God with your body,” not sin

against it (v. 20).

 

Comment: About “Do you not know…” (vv. 15-20)

 As with the last issue (lawsuits), Paul develops his argument with a series of “Do you not know” rhetorical questions.

         V. 15—Do you not know that your body is united with Christ?

         Therefore, you should not unite it with a prostitute.

           

Conflict Management: Cultivating Concord in the Church at Corinth

The relationship is not immediately clear because the analogy is not quite parallel, but that is part of Paul’s point…

         V. 16—Do you not know that the one involves a physical union and the other a spiritual union?

         Therefore, you shouldn’t threaten the one with another. That is, you can have only one kind of union—moral or immoral—so don’t allow a fleeting encounter to disrupt your relationship with God: “Flee from sexual immorality” (v. 18a). If you don’t, you’re only hurting yourself. (v. 18b; cf. 6:8).

         V. 19—Do you not know that your body belongs to God?

         Therefore, you shouldn’t think that you can do whatever you want with it: “[H]onor God with your body” (v. 20; cf. Rom 6:1-8:17).

 

Query: Is Paul against marriage?

         How does the physical union between a man and his wife not violate Paul’s prohibition against joining with another person?

         There is no immorality involved, no violation of God’s holiness.

         What does this passage say about other practices that harm the body (e.g., drunkenness, gluttony, smoking)?53

         Nothing, because none of these involve union with another person. Hence, they come under the category of “sins[?] a man commits…outside his body” (v. 18). That is, “no other sin is directed specifically toward one’s own body in the way that sexual immorality is…[because the violation] against one’s own body [is] viewed in terms of its place in redemptive history” (Fee 1987:262-263). This is Paul’s eschatological perspective: We are not at liberty to do as we please with our bodies. They belong to God, and He is not finished with them yet because in the end He is going to resurrect them.

         What two ways have we seen then, according to Paul, that believers constitute the temple of the Holy Spirit?

         In 3:16, the Holy Spirit’s temple is the corporate body of the believers, whose union with each other is threatened by rival factions.

         In 6:19, the Holy Spirit’s temple is the physical body of the believer, whose union with Christ is threatened by rival liaisons.

 

           

—Immorality

 Paul hears there is immorality in the Corinthian church, because some members have adopted a Gnostic dualism that viewed the body as something one discards at death in order that the soul might be free. They thought the presence of God’s Spirit meant the negation of the body, which meant they could do whatever they wanted with it because God would destroy it in the end. Paul corrects their error by stating that God will raise the body in the end, as He did with Jesus’ body. This is an important distinction: The focus of Christianity is not on the immortality of the soul but on the resurrection of the body.

 Furthermore, one of the implications of redemption is that one’s body belongs to God (being part of the purchase price) and must, therefore, be used to honor Him. Sexual immorality not only fails in this respect (to honor God), but actually damages one’s relationship with God, because it introduces a rival into that union. “The body is included in the redemptive work of God and therefore may not be involved in sexual immorality” (Fee 1987:265-266).

 

 In the first part of his letter, Paul deals with four problems in the Corinthian church that have come to his attention. The congregation did not officially ask for his advice on these matters, perhaps because in none of them do the Corinthians show themselves to be any better than their pagan neighbors.

         The faction problem exposes disunity instead of unity.

         The discipline problem exposes impurity instead of purity.

         The lawsuits problem exposes selfishness instead of selflessness.

         The sexual problem exposes immorality instead of morality.

This is not a particularly effective way of turning other people’s attention toward God.

 From these problems, Paul speaks to issues that the church has specifically requested he address.

 

Monday, February 13, 2023

Conflict Management - 1 Corinthians 6:1-11

 

Lesson 5: The Church’s Problems—Lawsuits

 

 As we look at our society, we note the decline, not only in morality but in civility. People show less courtesy toward one another, whether in a store line or in traffic. They want something, and other people are simply obstacles to that goal. The notion of personal rights, that I am entitled to something, has led to an increase in litigation, as people sue one another in a vast array of claims and counter-claims, some legitimate but many frivolous. No one is immune, not even Christians. We try to avoid it, but we may not be able to prevent it. What if litigation enters the church, and members sue other members?

 

Illustration: Sarah is struggling with history at school and is concerned about the midterm exam. Jeff knows this and decides to go into the extortion business. Seeing that she wrote her locker combination on the cover of her notebook, he copies it and steals her notes. The next morning, and the day before the exam, he says to her, “If you want your notes back, give me your lunch money.” She is trapped. If she does not pay, she will fail the exam. If she complains to a teacher, Jeff will just deny the accusation, it might take days to sort out, and she will still fail the exam. So, she pays. After the exam, she is really stewing that Jeff, who is supposed to be a Christian, has gotten away with this. There is a Student Council, which handles such cases. Jeff might still deny it, but she notices that he wrote her locker combination on the cover of his notebook, and she could use that as evidence. What should she do?

 

 Should the church get involved or leave such matters to the courts. Last time, we saw that the church is responsible to judge the immoral behavior of its members. Paul continues his treatment of “judging” in chapter 6 by stating that the church is also responsible to adjudicate in civil suits among its members.

 

             C. Lawsuits         6:1-11

 

1 Cor 6:1 If any of you has a dispute with another, dare he take it before the ungodly for judgment instead of before the saints? 2 Do you not know that the saints will judge the world? And if you are to judge the world, are you not competent to judge trivial cases? 3 Do you not know that we will judge angels? How much more the things of this life! 4 Therefore, if you have disputes about such matters, appoint as judges even men of little account in the church! 5 I say this to shame you. Is it possible that there is nobody among you wise enough to judge a dispute between believers? 6 But instead, one brother goes to law against another—and this in front of unbelievers!

             

—Lawsuits

 7 The very fact that you have lawsuits among you means you have been completely defeated already. Why not rather be wronged? Why not rather be cheated? 8 Instead, you yourselves cheat and do wrong, and you do this to your brothers. 9 Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders 10 nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. 11 And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.

 

1.        Symptom

       Civil disputes (v. 1)

2.        Cause

       Pride (v. 7)

3.        Solution

                           a. Settle your disputes internally (v. 1).

1)    Appoint your own judges (v. 4).

 

Comment: About “Appoint as judges…men…in the church” (v. 4)

 Paul is following the rabbinic interpretation of Exod 2:1.38 b Git 88b R. Tarfon [b. 60 C.E.?] used to say: “In any place where you find heathen law courts, even though their law is the same as the Israelite law, you must not resort to them since it says [in Exod], ‘These are the judgments which you shall bring before them,’ that is to say, ‘before them [your own judges]’ and not before heathens.”

 

2)    Take a personal loss (v. 7).       3) You only hurt each other (v. 8).

           b. Think about the future judgment (see Comment).  1) These present issues are lessor matters (v. 2).

2)    These present issues are physical matters (v. 3).

3)    These present issues are carnal matters (v. 9).

 

Comment: About Paul’s eschatological framework

 Paul’s entire argument against airing internal disputes in public courts is based on his eschatological understanding of the church.39 He asks three “Do you not know” rhetorical questions:40

         V. 2—Do you not know that in the future you will be judging the very ones to whom you now appeal for judgment?41

         Given the great responsibility you will have then, should you not show yourself competent to deal with lesser matters now?

Conflict Management: Cultivating Concord in the Church at Corinth

         V. 3—Do you not know that in the future you will be rendering judgments on matters in the spiritual realm?

         Should you not, therefore, be able to handle these matters of the physical realm?

         Vv. 9-11—Do you not know that in the future the wicked will not be in God’s kingdom?

         Should you not be demonstrating your separation from carnal issues as you look toward the kingdom?

As one commentator remarks (Fee 1987:230),

Such people have no standing at all with the people of God. The absurdity of the Corinthian position is that the saints will judge the very world before whom they are now appearing and asking for judgment. Not only does such an action [contradict] who they are as the people of God, but it does so in the presence of unbelievers, the very people [for] whom the church is to be God’s alternative.

 

Query: What is the church’s relationship to civil courts?

         Are civil courts inherently bad? Why/not?

         No, they are part of a governmental system that God ordained to establish and maintain social order.42

         No, Paul used them.43

         Under what conditions may believers use civil courts?

         When dealing with unbelievers (which Paul does not address here), although it is still probably better to avoid them, if possible.44

         What two additions in vv. 9-10 does Paul make to his list of sins in 5:9-10 that are becoming less stigmatized in modern society? (adultery and homosexuality)

         Paul is echoing prohibitions in Torah.45

         With all due respect to the Gay community, what does this say about homosexuality being a preference one receives at birth or a legitimate alternative lifestyle (especially in view of v. 11)?46

 

Application: Getting back to the primary issue, lawsuits between believers, what do you think of this remark by one commentator (Fee 1987:238)?

The difficulties with our [applying] this text are related primarily to our general lack of a biblical self-understanding, especially in terms of the essential eschatological framework of our existence as the people of the future who are to be totally conditioned by that future as we live in the present. Therefore, our priorities tend to be warped towards the values of this age rather than of the age to come. Here we have great need of deep reformation [especially since m]ost legal actions on the part of Christians are predicated on “rights” and “the pursuit of property” in the present age.

 

—Lawsuits

 Upon hearing there are lawsuits in the Corinthian church because of pride among the members, Paul’s notes that the failure of these men—and it may only involve a couple of individuals—is actually a failure of the church, in that their practices bear little distinction from the surrounding pagan culture. Christians, if they are to have any impact on society, must be demonstrably different from society.

 What we see in this section is that the impact a church has is not just a group project. On the contrary, the impact of any given church is more often measured by the individual lives of its congregants. Moreover, one of the simplest, yet most effective, ways we demonstrate the difference of Christianity is in our behavior toward each other. Jesus said, “By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another” (John 13:35).47